![]() ![]() I certainly agree with them on the subject of Nessie. I haven’t seen the final published product yet, but I was a reviewer (and blurb-writer) so am familiar with its contents. Oh, and now is a good time to mention sceptical approaches to cryptozoology since Daniel Loxton and Donald Prothero have just published their new cryptozoology-themed book Abominable Science! Origins of the Yeti, Nessie, and Other Famous Cryptids. The article here is a revamped version of one that appeared on Tet Zoo ver 2 in December 2007. ![]() It was quickly shown to be yet another hoax, as discussed below. Just to prove that international interest in the monster remains, new photos get their fair share of media attention every few years, and within recent months another supposedly interesting image appeared. In reality, there’s no reason at all to think that it does. I’ve participated in several TV documentary on the LNM in the last few years and all – no matter how many sceptical scientists they feature, no matter how many negative points they cover – work hard to leave the case open, as if we can still hold out hope that a giant, undiscovered aquatic animal awaits discovery in the loch. The Loch Ness Monster - Nessie - is always there no matter what people say, and no matter what evidence fails to come in, it never goes away. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |